Williams v. Pitt County Board of Education et al
Filing
44
ORDER adopting 43 Memorandum and Recommendation; granting 38 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by Senior Judge W. Earl Britt on 3/23/2020. (Herrmann, L.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
EASTERN DIVISION
No. 4:18–CV–32–BR
HENRY WILLIAMS, II,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
PITT COUNTY BOARD OF
)
EDUCATION,
)
)
Defendant.
)
____________________________________)
ORDER
This matter is before the court on Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr.’s Memorandum
and Recommendation (“M&R”) recommending the court grant defendant’s motion to dismiss for
plaintiff’s failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (DE # 43.)
Plaintiff did not file an objection thereto.
“The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or
legal conclusion of the magistrate judge to which no objections have been raised.” Clark v.
Harrah’s NC Casino Co., LLC, No. 1:17–CV–00240–MR–DLH, 2018 WL 4664136, at *1
(W.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2018) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (“There is no
indication that Congress, in enacting § 636(b)(1)(C), intended to require a district judge to
review a magistrate’s report to which no objections are filed.”)). Accordingly, the court
ADOPTS the M&R as its own. Defendant’s motion to dismiss is ALLOWED. Plaintiff’s
complaint is DISMISSED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the case.
This 23 March 2020.
__________________________________
W. Earl Britt
Senior U.S. District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?