Rambert et al v. City of Greenville et al
Filing
85
ORDER granting 81 Motion for Reconsideration regarding 59 Order. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. All of Plaintiffs' remaining claims are dismissed with prejudice. The clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 1/6/2025. (Collins, S)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
EASTERN DIVISION
SEAN M. RAMBERT, SR., and
DANIELLE COX RAMBERT, coadministrators of THE ESTATE OF
SEAN MICHAEL RAMBERT, JR.
Plaintiffs,
No. 4:21-cv-00020-FL
v.
DAVID BRANDON JOHNSON, in his
individual and official capacities, and
CITY OF GREENVILLE, NORTH
CAROLINA,
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
P. 54(b), to reconsider its prior interlocutory order (DE 59) on Defendants’ Motion for
Summary Judgment (DE 21). Plaintiffs do not contest the motion. In light of the
Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in this case, Rambert v. City of Greenville,
107 F.4th 388 (4th Cir. 2024) (DE 72), this Court concludes that Defendants are
entitled to judgment as a matter of law on each of Plaintiffs’ remaining claims.
Therefore, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. All of
Plaintiffs’ remaining claims are dismissed with prejudice.
The clerk is DIRECTED to close this case.
SO ORDERED, this the 6th day of January, 2025.
__________________________________
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?