Rambert et al v. City of Greenville et al

Filing 85

ORDER granting 81 Motion for Reconsideration regarding 59 Order. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. All of Plaintiffs' remaining claims are dismissed with prejudice. The clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 1/6/2025. (Collins, S)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION SEAN M. RAMBERT, SR., and DANIELLE COX RAMBERT, coadministrators of THE ESTATE OF SEAN MICHAEL RAMBERT, JR. Plaintiffs, No. 4:21-cv-00020-FL v. DAVID BRANDON JOHNSON, in his individual and official capacities, and CITY OF GREENVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), to reconsider its prior interlocutory order (DE 59) on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 21). Plaintiffs do not contest the motion. In light of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in this case, Rambert v. City of Greenville, 107 F.4th 388 (4th Cir. 2024) (DE 72), this Court concludes that Defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on each of Plaintiffs’ remaining claims. Therefore, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. All of Plaintiffs’ remaining claims are dismissed with prejudice. The clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. SO ORDERED, this the 6th day of January, 2025. __________________________________ LOUISE W. FLANAGAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?