Edwartoski et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Filing
40
ORDER granting 37 Consent Motion to Stay. The parties are DIRECTED to file jointly a report indicating the status of the personal property claim every 90 days, or upon defendant's completion of review of the personal pr operty claim, whichever is sooner. All activity in this case is STAYED pending submission of plaintiff's personal property claim and defendant's completion of review of the same. Within 14 days of defendant's completion of review, the parties are DIRECTED to file jointly a proposed amended case management order. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 1/18/2023. (Collins, S.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
EASTERN DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:21-cv-00160-FL
ERIC EDWARTOSKI and APRIL
EDWARTOSKI,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY
COMPANY,
Defendant.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs Eric Edwartoski and April
Edwartoski’s Consent Motion to Extend Stay Pending Submission of Personal Property Claim
(“Motion”). For good cause shown, and it being reported to the Court that counsel for State Farm
Fire and Casualty Company consents to the motion, that motion is GRANTED.
The parties are DIRECTED to file jointly a report indicating the status of the
personal property claim every 90 days, or upon defendant's completion of review of the
personal property claim, whichever is sooner. All activity in this case is STAYED
pending submission of plaintiff's personal property claim and defendant's completion of review
of the same. Within 14 days of defendant's completion of review, the parties are DIRECTED to
file jointly a proposed amended case management order.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this the 17th day of January, 2023.
__________________________________
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN
United States District Judge
Case 4:21-cv-00160-FL Document 40 Filed 01/18/23 Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?