ABB INC. v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Filing 106

ORDER denying 48 Motion for Summary Judgment. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for further information. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 4/5/2012. (Edwards, S.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. S:08-CV-2S-F ABB,INC., ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., Defendant. ORDER The court again has reviewed CSXT's Motion for Summary Judgment [DE-48-1] on the issues that remain following entry of this court's order of March 22, 2012 [DE-lOS] allowing CSXT's motion for summary judgment on its affirmative defense oflimitation ofliability [DE-48­ 2]. In that resolution of the remaining issues will require evaluation of witness credibility and fact-finding upon assessment of conflicting "expert" (or "opinion") witness testimony concerning mechanical, scientific and technical evidence, the court concludes that genuine issues of material fact abound necessitating a trial. CSXT's Motion for Summary Judgment [DE-48-1] as to ABB's Carmack claim is DENIED. A trial date during this court's May 14, 2012, term of courtl has been announced. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to re-schedule the parties' Pretrial Conference with Magistrate Judge David W. Daniel, at his direction in light of that trial date. SO ORDERED. This, the I day of April, 2012. J ESC. FOX S ior United States District Judge 1 The last scheduled trial date, June 6, 2011, was abandoned after the parties requested a court-hosted settlement conference, which concluded unsuccessfully on June 7, 2011. See Minute Entry [DE-103]. At that point, the matter was re-submitted to the undersigned on the cross-motions for summary judgment.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?