SMD Software, Inc. et al v. EMove, Inc.

Filing 395

ORDER granting 384 Motion to Seal 383 PROPOSED SEALED Response and Exhibit 1 - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 04/16/2014. (Baker, C.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION FILE NO. 5:08-cv-00403-FL SMD SOFTWARE, INC., et al. : : : : : : : : : Plaintiffs v. EMOVE, INC. et al. Defendants. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ CONSENTED-TO MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REDACTED RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTIONS IN LIMINE, AND EXHIBIT 1 THERETO UNDER SEAL Plaintiffs’ Consented-to Motion for Leave to File Redacted Response to Defendants’ Memorandum of Law in Support of their Motions in Limine, and Exhibit 1 thereto under seal, is GRANTED. The Court further finds: 1. That the quality of the material at issue (non-public f i n an ci a l a n d pricing information) justifies the filing of a redacted version of Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Memorandum of Law in Support of their Motions in Limine and Exhibit 1 thereto under seal despite the balance of competing interests in access to public records; 2. That the parties’ interests in maintaining the confidentiality of their non-public financial and pricing information override any constitutional or common law right of public access which may attach to the information; and 3. That there is no adequate alternative to allowing Plaintiffs to file a redacted version of Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Memorandum of Law in Support of their Motions in Limine and Exhibit 1 thereto under seal. SO ORDERED, this the 16th day of April , 2014. LOUISE W. FLANAGAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?