O'Fay v. Sessoms & Rogers, P.A. et al

Filing 62

JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the court GRANTS IN PART and DISMISSES IN PART defendants motion for partial summary judgment [D.E. 40]. Specifically, the court GRANTS defendants motion for summary judgment as to plaintiffs 15 U.S.C. 1692e (10) claim, but DISMISSES without prejudice defendants motion for summary judgment on their counterclaim. The court also GRANTS in part plaintiffs motion for attorneys fees and costs [D.E. 50], and orders Unifund to pay plaintiff $6,382.50 in attorneys fees and $350.00 in costs Signed by Dennis P. Ivarone, Clerk of Court by Debby Sawyer, Deputy Clerk on 8/25/2010. (Sawyer, D.)

Download PDF
O'Fay v. Sessoms & Rogers, P.A. et al Doc. 62 A O 4 5 0 ( R e v . 5/85) United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA W E S T E R N DIVISION JE N N E LL O'FAY, P l a i n t i f f, v. ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE CASE NO. 5:08-CV-615-D SESSOMS & ROGERS, P.A., UNIFUND CCR PARTNERS, PEDRO ZABALA II, and DONNA PRIMROSE, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Decision by the Court: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the court GRANTS IN PART and DISMISSES IN PART defendants' motion for partial summary judgment [D.E. 40]. Specifically, the court GRANTS defendants' motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff's 15 U.S.C. 1692e(10) claim, but DISMISSES without prejudice defendants' motion for summary judgment on their counterclaim. The court also GRANTS in part plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees and costs [D.E. 50] and orders Unifund to pay plaintiff $6,382.50 in attorney's fees and $350.00 in costs. THE ABOVE JUDGMENT WAS ENTERED TODAY, AUGUST 25, 2010 WITH A COPY TO: Angela Orso Martin (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) Mary Catherine Crowell Pavur (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) August 25, 2010 Date DENNIS P. IAVARONE, Clerk Eastern District of North Carolina /s/ Debby Sawyer (By) Deputy Clerk Raleigh, North Carolina Page 1 of 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?