Lloyd v. Astrue

Filing 25

JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court's order entered July 14, 2010, that plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied as moot. Defendant's motion to remand is granted and this matte r is remanded to the Social Security Administration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for rehearing and further proceedings consistent with the memorandum and recommendation. Signed by Clerk of Court on 07/15/2010. Copies served electronically. (Baker, C.)

Download PDF
L l o y d v . A s t r u e D o UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MARY BETH T. LLOYD, Plaintiff, v. JUDGMENT No. 5:09-CV-292-FL MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Decision by Court. This action came before the Honorable Louise W. Flanagan, Chief United States District Judge, for consideration of the plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings, defendant's motion to remand, and the memorandum and recommendation entered by the United States Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court's order entered July 14, 2010, that plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied as moot. Defendant's motion to remand is granted and this matter is remanded to the Social Security Administration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for rehearing and further proceedings consistent with the memorandum and recommendation. This Judgment Filed and Entered on July 15, 2010, and Copies To: Cynthia M. Currin (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) Lori A. Dutra (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) Eskunder R.T. Boyd (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) Marian A. Harder (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) July 15, 2010 DENNIS P. IAVARONE, CLERK /s/ Christa N. Baker (By) Christa N. Baker, Deputy Clerk D o c

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?