Wynne v. Astrue

Filing 17

JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court's order entered June 14, and for the reasons set forth more specifically within the memorandum and recommendation, that plaintiff's motion for judgment on the plead ings is granted and defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. This matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the memorandum and recommendation. Signed by Chief Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 06/15/2010. Copies served electronically. (Baker, C.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ILA P. WYNNE for DARRELL W. PENNELL, Plaintiff/Claimant, v. JUDGMENT No. 5:09-CV-367-FL MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Decision by Court. This action came before the Honorable Louise W. Flanagan, Chief United States District Judge, for consideration of the parties' cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings and the memorandum and recommendation entered by the United States Magistrate Judge, to which no objections were filed. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court's order entered June 14, and for the reasons set forth more specifically within the memorandum and recommendation, that plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted and defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. This matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the memorandum and recommendation. This Judgment Filed and Entered on June 15, 2010, and Copies To: Michael B. Sosna (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) Mary Ellen Russell (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) June 15, 2010 DENNIS P. IAVARONE, CLERK /s/ Christa N. Baker (By) Christa N. Baker, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?