Buckner v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Filing 69

ORDER denying 66 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge David W. Daniel on 2/23/2012. (Marsh, K)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:09-CV-00411-BR CHRISTOPHER EUGENE BUCKNER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER This matter is before the Court on pro se Plaintiff s motion to reconsider [DE-66]. Defendant has responded to Plaintiffs motion [DE-68], and the matter is ripe for decision. Plaintiffseeks reconsideration ofa portion ofthe Court's December 22, 2011 Order [DE-65], specifically the denial of Plaintiffs motion to compel with respect to Document Request nos. 1 and 8. With respect to Document Request No.1, Plaintiff contends that the Court failed to consider that Defendant did not produce "electronic timecards." As the Court stated in its prior order, Defendant has provided Plaintiff with his payroll records as they are maintained in the ordinary course of business, which is all that Defendant is required to do under Rule 34(2)(E). Defendant need not create documents that do not already exist. With respect to Document Request No.8, Plaintiff contends that his request for other employees' wage history is relevant to his overtime wage claim. As the Court stated it its prior order, the wage history ofother employees is not relevant to Plaintiff s overtime claim. Plaintiffs only remaining claim is his overtime claim under the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. § 207. [DE-28 & 36.] All other claims, including a claim under section 301 of the LMRA, 29 U.S.C. § 185, related to the rate of pay Plaintiff claims he was entitled to receive under the CBA have been dismissed. Id. r ! r f r i l ! t The Court fully considered the requests at issue in ruling on Plaintiff s motion to compel and finds no reason to reverse its December 22, 2011 Order. Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion to reconsider is DENIED. This the ,..~ -Z 3 day of February, 2012. DAVID W. DANIEL United States Magistrate Judge I I I ( 2 f

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?