ANTRANICK v. RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE, INTERNATIONAL et al

Filing 63

JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the court GRANTS RTI's and Unity's motions to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction [D.E. 49, 55, 41, 48] and declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims. The court also DISMISSES Unity's motion for a protective order [D.E. 57] and all other pending motions [D.E. 15, 11, 13] as MOOT. Signed by Dennis P. Iavaroane, Clerk of Court by Debby Sawyer, Deputy Clerk on 8/12/2010. Copies served. (Sawyer, D.)

Download PDF
A O 4 5 0 ( R e v . 5/85) United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA W E S T E R N DIVISION E S T A T E OF MARANI AWANIS MANOOK, P l a i n t i f f, v. ) ) ) ) ) J U D G M E N T IN A CIVIL CASE CASE NO. 5:10-CV-72-D RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE, INTERNATIONAL, and UNITY RESOURCES GROUP, L.L.C., Defendants. AND JALAL ASKANDER ANTRANICK, Plaintiff, v. RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE, INTERNATIONAL, and UNITY RESOURCES GROUP, L.L.C., Defendants. Decision by the Court: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 5:10-CV-73-D IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the court GRANTS RTI's and Unity's motions to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction [D.E. 49, 55, 41, 48] and declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims. The court also DISMISSES Unity's motion for a protective order [D.E. 57] and all other pending motions [D.E. 15, 11, 13] as MOOT. Page 1 of 2 THE ABOVE JUDGMENT WAS ENTERED TODAY, AUGUST 12, 2010 WITH A COPY TO: Janet Ward Black (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) Douglas P. Faucette (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) Clifton L. Brinson (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) Paul David Wolf (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) August 12, 2010 Date DENNIS P. IAVARONE, Clerk Eastern District of North Carolina /s/ Debby Sawyer (By) Deputy Clerk Raleigh, North Carolina Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?