Mavilla et al v. Absolute Collection Service, Inc. et al

Filing 99

JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, pursuant to the court's order entered 9/23/2014 [DE-95], Plaintiffs' objection that Defendant's Motion for Bill of Costs [DE-92] was untimely filed is granted as to the district cou rt costs and Plaintiffs' objection that an award of costs is manifestly unjust is denied as moot. A review of Defendant's bill of costs fails to show sufficient information that Defendant incurred any costs under Fed.R.App.P.39(e) and any s uch costs are denied without prejudice. All other costs are waived under Local Civil Rule 54.1(a)(3) and Fed.R.App.P.39(d). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, pursuant to the court's order entered 9/17/2015 [DE-98], Plaintiffs� 39; objection to the Defendant's Supplemental Motion for Bill of Costs [DE-96] is granted. Defendant's request for costs under Fed. R. App. P. 39(e) is disallowed. Signed by Deputy Clerk Jacqueline B. Grady on behalf of Julie Richards Johnston, Clerk of Court on 10/2/2015. (Grady, B.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION

NARENDRA MAVILLA and
PADMAVATHI MAVILLA
Plaintiffs,
v.
ABSOLUTE COLLECTION
SERVICE, INC. and WAKEMED
FACULTY PHYSICIANS,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

JUDGMENT
No. 5:10-CV-412-F

Decision by Court.
This action came before Julie Richards Johnston, Clerk of Court, for ruling as follows:
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, pursuant to the court’s order entered
9/23/2014 [DE-95], Plaintiffs’ objection that Defendant’s Motion for Bill of Costs [DE-92] was
untimely filed is granted as to the district court costs and Plaintiffs’ objection that an award of costs
is manifestly unjust is denied as moot. A review of Defendant’s bill of costs fails to show sufficient
information that Defendant incurred any costs under Fed.R.App.P. 39(e) and any such costs are
denied without prejudice. All other costs are waived under Local Civil Rule 54.1(a)(3) and
Fed.R.App.P.39(d).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, pursuant to the court’s order
entered 9/17/2015 [DE-98], Plaintiffs’ objection to the Defendant’s Supplemental Motion for Bill
of Costs [DE-96] is granted. Defendant’s request for costs under Fed. R. App. P. 39(e) is disallowed.

This Judgment Filed and Entered on October 2, 2015, and Copies To:
Christopher W. Livingston (via CM/ECF electronic notification)
Jennifer D. Maldonado (via CM/ECF electronic notification)
Sean T. Partrick (via CM/ECF electronic notification)

DATE
October 2, 2015

JULIE RICHARDS JOHNSTON, CLERK
/s/ Jacqueline B. Grady
(By) Jacqueline B. Grady, Deputy Clerk