Tran v. Coty Inc.

Filing 19

ORDER granting 15 Motion to Consolidate Cases. Case number 5:10-CV-431-H is hereby designated as the lead case. ALL FILINGS SHOULD BE MADE IN THE LEAD CASE ONLY. Signed by Senior Judge Malcolm J. Howard on 6/14/2011. (Heath, D.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION DINH TRAN, Plaintiff, 5:10-CV-431-H v. COTY, INC., Defendant. DINH TRAN, Plaintiff, 5:11-CV-114-H v. COTY, INC., Defendant. These matters are before consolidate by the defendant. the court on the motions In reviewing these matters, to the court has found that these two matters involve the same parties and the complaints in the two matters are virtually identical. One matter (5:10-CV-431-H) was filed in this court on October 7, 2010. The In that matter is currently pending a motion to dismiss. second matter (5:11-CV-114-H) was originally filed in the Superior Court of Lee County, Inc. ("Coty") removed the North Carolina. case to the Defendant Coty, United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. Defendant then moved to transfer venue to this court, which was granted by order filed March 14, 2011. Because both the parties identical in both matters, and allegations are virtually the court hereby grants defendant's motions and consolidates these matters for all purposes. Case Number 5:10-CV-431-H is hereby designated as the lead case. All filings should be made in the lead case only. Also before the court is defendant's motion to stay in Case Number 5:11-CV-114-H. granted, For good cause shown, the motion and defendant is given 10 days from the date of this order to file any responsive pleadings required or allowed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This is ~ 'E!-. day of June 2011. Malcolm J. 0 Senior United At Greenville, NC #26 2 District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?