Tran v. Coty Inc.
Filing
19
ORDER granting 15 Motion to Consolidate Cases. Case number 5:10-CV-431-H is hereby designated as the lead case. ALL FILINGS SHOULD BE MADE IN THE LEAD CASE ONLY. Signed by Senior Judge Malcolm J. Howard on 6/14/2011. (Heath, D.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
DINH TRAN,
Plaintiff,
5:10-CV-431-H
v.
COTY, INC.,
Defendant.
DINH TRAN,
Plaintiff,
5:11-CV-114-H
v.
COTY, INC.,
Defendant.
These
matters
are
before
consolidate by the defendant.
the
court
on
the
motions
In reviewing these matters,
to
the
court has found that these two matters involve the same parties
and the complaints in the two matters are virtually identical.
One matter (5:10-CV-431-H) was filed in this court on October 7,
2010.
The
In that matter is currently pending a motion to dismiss.
second matter
(5:11-CV-114-H)
was
originally filed
in the
Superior Court of Lee County,
Inc.
("Coty")
removed
the
North Carolina.
case
to
the
Defendant Coty,
United States
District
Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. Defendant then
moved
to
transfer
venue
to
this
court,
which was
granted by
order filed March 14, 2011.
Because
both
the
parties
identical in both matters,
and
allegations
are
virtually
the court hereby grants defendant's
motions and consolidates these matters for all purposes.
Case
Number 5:10-CV-431-H is hereby designated as the lead case.
All
filings should be made in the lead case only.
Also before the court is defendant's motion to stay in Case
Number
5:11-CV-114-H.
granted,
For
good
cause
shown,
the
motion
and defendant is given 10 days from the date of this
order to file
any responsive pleadings required or allowed by
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This
is
~
'E!-.
day of June 2011.
Malcolm J. 0
Senior United
At Greenville, NC
#26
2
District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?