Pipefitters Local No. 636 Defined Benefit Plan v. Tekelec et al

Filing 54

JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court GRANTS the Motion to Dismiss [D.E. 40], and the Plaintiff's request to file a Third Amended Complaint is DENIED. Signed by Debby Sawyer, Deputy Clerk for Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 3/22/2013. (Sawyer, D.)

AO 450 (Rev. 5/85)

United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
PIPEFITTERS LOCAL NO. 636
DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
TEKELEC, FRANCO PLASTINA,
WILLIAM H. EVERETT, GREGORY RUSH,
and NORFOLK COUNTY RETIREMENT
SYSTEM,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-4-D

Decision by the Court:
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court GRANTS the Motion to Dismiss
[D.E. 40], and the Plaintiff’s request to file a Third Amended Complaint is DENIED.
THE ABOVE JUDGMENT WAS ENTERED TODAY, MARCH 22, 2013 WITH A
COPY TO:
David A. Rosenfeld (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)
L. Bruce McDaniel (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)
Carl N. Patterson, Jr. (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)
David H. Kistenbroker (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)
Michael J. Lohnes (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)
Richard L. Farley (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)

March 22, 2013
Date

JULIE A. RICHARDS, Clerk
Eastern District of North Carolina
/s/ Debby Sawyer
(By) Deputy Clerk

Raleigh, North Carolina

Page 1 of 1