Channing v. Equifax, Inc.

Filing 63

ORDER denying 47 Motion for Subpeonas; 50 Motion Requesting the Court Bring Perjury Charges Against Defendant and Legal Counsel ; 58 Notice of Rule 11 Violation; and 60 , 62 Request for Sanctions - As to 23 MOTION for Summary Judgment, the court prohibits further filings by plaintiff pending disposition of that motion. Should the case remain, after decision on the motion for summary judgment, stay of action will be lifted. Should plaintiff attempt further filings in contravention of this court's order, defendant is relieved of any responsibility to brief in opposition. Defendant's request for fees and expenses associated with the making of responses to motions herein denied is HELD IN ABEYANCE. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 02/06/2013. (Baker, C.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
NO. 5:11-CV-293-FL
VICTOR CHANNING,
Plaintiff,

v.
EQUIP AX, INC.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

This matter comes before the court on plaintiffs motion for subpoenas (DE# 4 7), his motion
requesting the court bring perjury charges against defendant and counsel (DE# 50), and plaintiffs
notice ofRule 11 violation (DE# 58), and request for sanctions, as supplemented (DE## 60, 62).
Cause not having been shown, plaintiffs motions and requests are DENIED.
Where defendant's motion for summary judgment, filed March 16, 2012 (DE# 23 ), to which
plaintiff responded on April9, 2012 and defendant replied on April26, 2012, remains pending, and
the court's focus now being directed towards decision on the issues therein raised, for the continued
efficient administration of justice, the court prohibits further filings by plaintiff pending disposition
of that motion.
Should the case remain, after decision on the motion for summary judgment (DE #23), stay
of action will be lifted. Should plaintiff attempt further filings in contravention of this court's order,
defendant is relieved of any responsibility to brief in opposition.
Defendant's request for fees and expenses associated with the making of responses to
motions herein denied is HELD IN ABEYANCE.

SO ORDERED, this the 6th day of February, 2013.

2