United States of America v. Connelly et al

Filing 50

ORDER denying 45 Motion to Strike; granting 47 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response regarding 42 MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Response at 44 is deemed as timely filed. Response deadline extended to by 8/17/2012. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 8/20/2012. (Edwards, S.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERCIAFOR )
THE USE AND BENEFIT OF
CARL BURKHOLDER and
A.G. ENTERPRISES OF SARASOTA,
L.L.C., formerly A.G. ENTERPRISES,
L.L.C.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
R.A. CONNELLY; R.A.
CONNELLY, INC.;
THE HANOVER INSURANCE
COMPANY
Defendants.

Civil Action No. 5:11-cv-445

)

)

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

[DE-47]

THIS CAUSE being heard on motion of Plaintiff's motion for an order enlarging time in
[DE-42]

which to respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, and for good cause shown,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the time within which Plaintiff may respond to the
Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is extended to and including August 1 7

,

2012.

In the interest of justice, the Plaintiffs' Response [DE-44] is
deemed timely.
Defendants' Joint Motion to Strike [DE-45] is DENIED.

This the

20

day ofAugust, 2012.

JiJIES F. FOX
Senior U.S. District Judge