Hicks et al v. Gemmy Industries Corp. et al

Filing 39

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 37 Motion to Stay. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 5/11/2012. (Edwards, S.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No.5:11-CV-652-F WILLIAM HICKS, Individually, and KELL Y HICKS, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem for D.H., a minor and D.H., Plaintiffs, v. GEMMY INDUSTRIES CORP., GEMMY INDUSTRIES (HK), LIMITED, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) This matter is before the court on the Joint Consent Motion to Stay or in the Alternative, Modify Scheduling Order [DE-37]. The parties' request to stay is DENIED, but, for good cause shown, their alternative request to extend the deadlines in the Scheduling Order by ninety days is ALLOWED. The trial in this matter is continued to the term ofcourt commencing on June 3, 2013. SO ORDERED. This the 11th day of May. Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?