Polyzen, Inc. v. Radiadyne, LLC

Filing 241

ORDER granting 234 Motion to Seal Document ; granting 236 Motion to Seal Document ; granting 183 Motion to Seal; granting 187 Motion to Seal; granting 191 Motion to Seal; granting 199 Motion to Seal Document ; granting 205 Motion to Seal Document ; granting 208 Motion to Seal Document ; granting 219 Motion to Seal Document ; granting 224 Motion to Seal Document. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 2/3/2016. (Briggeman, N.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
No. 5:11-CV-662-D

RADIADYNE, LLC.,

)
)

Plaintiff,

)

Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)

v.
POLYZEN, INC.,

ORDER

RadiaDyne, L.L.C. ("RadiaDyne") has filed ten motions to seal. See [D.E. 183, 187, 191,
199, 205,208, 219, 224, 234, 236]. Polyzen, Inc. opposes three of the motions to seal. See [D.E.
195, 196, 197].
The court has reviewed the motions to seal under the governing standard. See, ~. Doe v.
Pub. Citizen, 749 F.3d 246, 272-73 (4th Cir. 2014). The public has had a notice of the sealing
request and a reasonable opportunity to respond. See id. at 272. No member of the public has
responded. The court has considered less drastic alternatives to sealing, but does not find that any
less drastic alternative exists. Id. Moreover, the court finds that RadiaDyne has demonstrated that
the material at issue in the motions to seal includes confidential and competitively sensitive
commercial information concerning RadiaDyne's business. Accordingly, the court GRANTS the
motions to seal [D.E. 183, 187, 191, 199, 205, 208, 219, 224, 234, 236].
SO ORDERED. This _J_ day of February 2016.

J
SC.DEVERill
Chief United States District Judge