Rodgers v. Astrue
Filing
31
CONSENT ORDER granting 30 Motion for Attorney Fees - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/27/2012. (Baker, C.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
5:11-CV-671-FL
BEN RODGERS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
CONSENT ORDER
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
)
Commissioner of Social
)
Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the
parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through her attorney, has executed this Consent
Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant
United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of
Social Security should pay the sum of $4,705.81 for attorney fees, in full and final settlement of
all claims due against the Social Security Administration, for attorney fees arising under the
Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff’s
counsel the sum of $4,705.81 in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under EAJA, 28
U.S.C. § 2412(d), and upon the payment of such sums this case is dismissed with prejudice.
August
27th
This _____ day of ___________, 2012.
____________________
United States District Judge
CONSENTED TO:
CHARLOTTE W. HALL
Attorney for Plaintiff
N.C. Bar # 41290
Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C.
P.O. Box 10629
Raleigh, NC 27605
Telephone: (919) 791-1883
Fax: (919) 791-1886
charlotte@charleshallfirm.com
KATHLEEN BUCKNER
Attorney for Defendant
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
Office of the General Counsel
Room 617, Altmeyer Building
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, MD 21235-6401
Telephone: (410)965-3202
Facsimile (410)597-0137
Kathleen.Buckner@ssa.gov
Maryland Bar
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?