Thomas v. North Carolina Dept. of Health and Human Services, Division of Social Services, Child Support Enforcement Section

Filing 29

ORDER denying 25 Motion for Reconsideration, denying as moot 27 Motion to Enter Exhibits into Evidence and denying as moot 28 Motion to Enter Exhibit 5 into Evidence. Signed by Senior Judge W. Earl Britt on 3/24/2014. Copy of order to plaintiff via US Mail at address on record. (Marsh, K)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION RANDY L. THOMAS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. AIDA CORREA, Defendant. RANDY L. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO: 5:11-CV-00715-BR NO: 5:12-CV-00016-BR ORDER This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s 6 February 2014 motion for reconsideration of, and relief from, the State of North Carolina Office of Administrative Hearings’ order and decision filed 2 March 2012. This court, a federal court, does not have jurisdiction to review on appeal or reconsider a state administrative decision. See Kirkpatrick v. Lenoir Co. Bd. of Educ., 216 F.3d 380, 386 (4th Cir. 2000). Furthermore, the above-captioned cases were closed by judgments entered on 18 March 2013. With these cases having been closed more than one year ago, plaintiff should not be filing anything in these cases. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration is DENIED. Plaintiff’s motions to enter exhibits into evidence are DENIED as moot. This 24 March 2014. __________________________________ W. Earl Britt Senior U.S. District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?