J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Diaz

Filing 11

ORDER granting 9 Motion for Default Judgment. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for further information. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 11/28/2012. (Edwards, S.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No.5: 12-CV-233-F J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. MARINO ESTEBAN DIAZ , INDIVIDUALLY and d/b/a VELVET ROOM BAR AND LOUNGE, Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the court the Motion for Judgment Default [DE-9] filed by Plaintiff. I. PROCEDURAL mSTORY Plaintiff initiated this action against Defendant on April 28, 2012, by filing a Complaint alleging Defendant unlawfully intercepted and broadcast a program to which Plaintiff owned the exclusive nationwide closed-circuit rights, for the purpose of commercial advantage or private fmancial gain in violation of 47 U.S.C. §§ 553 and 605, and also alleging a claim for conversion under North Carolina law. The record shows that Defendant was served with process pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on June 4,2012. See Executed Summons [DE-5]. Defendant did not file a responsive pleading to the Complaint, and the Clerk of Court for the Eastern District ofNorth Carolina entered entry of default against Defendant on August 14,2012 [DE-8]. Plaintiff now moves for Default Judgment against Defendant, who has not filed a response to the motion. 1 II. FINDINGS OF FACT Upon default, the well-pleaded facts alleged in the Complaint are deemed admitted. See Ryans v. Homecomings Fin. Network, 253 F.3d 778, 780 (4th Cir. 2001). Based upon Plaintiffs Complaint, the court finds the following facts: Plaintiff "was granted the exclusive nationwide commercial distribution (closed-circuit) rights to The Floyd Mayweather, Jr. v. Shane Mosley, Welterweight Championship Fight Program [hereinafter "Program"] telecast nationwide on May I, 2010." CompI. [DE-I] ~ 8. It marketed the sub-licensing rights in the Program to commercial customers, such as bars, restaurants, and nightclubs. Id at ~ 9-10. Defendant, an individual d/b/a Velvet Room Bar and Lounge, exhibited the Program without Plaintiffs authorization at Defendant's Raleigh, North Carolina, location. Id ~ 11. III. DISCUSSION A. Default Judgment The court finds that it has subject matter jurisdiction over this matter, and that service on Defendant was obtained in accordance with Rule 4. Accordingly, this court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant. The Clerk of Court having filed entry of default on August 14, 2012, the court concludes that the procedural requirements for entry of default judgment have been met. B. Relief Although Plaintiff meets the technical requirements for entry of default judgment, the inquiry does not stop there. It is well settled that upon default, the facts alleged in the Complaint are deemed admitted. See Ryan v. Homecomings Fin. Network, 253 F.3d 778, 780 (4th Cir. 2 2001). The court, however, determines whether the facts, as alleged, support a claim and the relief sought. Id. In its motion for default judgment, Plaintiff seeks an award of damages, attorneys fees, and costs under § 605, and additional damages for its common law claim of conversion. Section 605 prohibits unauthorized individuals from intercepting "radio communication" and divulging or publishing the "existence, contents, substance, purport, effect, or meaning of such intercepted communication to any person." 47 U.S.C. § 605(a). An aggrieved party is entitled to actual damages or statutory damages. 47 U.S.c. § 605(e)(3)(C)(i). Statutory damages may be awarded in a sum of not less than $1,000 or more than $10,000, as the court considers just. 47 U.S.c. § 605(e)(3)(C)(i)(II). Violations that are willful and for purposes of direct or indirect commercial advantage or private financial gain may also, in the court's discretion, be subject to an enhancement of up to $100,000 in damages. 47 U.S.c. § 605(e)(3)(C)(ii). The court finds that the allegations in the Complaint establish that Defendant violated § 605(a). Compi. ~~ 8-12 [DE-I]. The court also finds that Plaintiffhas established that Defendant's violation of § 605 was willful and for commercial advantage. CompL ~ 11; see also Gagliardi Aff. ~ 9 [DE-9-3]("[T]0 the best of my knowledge our programming is not and cannot be mistakenly, innocently or accidentally intercepted."). In determining the amount of statutory damages, courts have used one of three approaches: (l) multiplying the number ofpatrons by the cost if each patron had paid a residential fee to watch the program; (2) imposing damages in an amount approximate to the licensing fee a defendant should have paid plaintiff, or (3) a flat amount J&J Sports Prods., Inc. v. Brazilian Paradise, LLeNo. 4:1O-cv-3I13-TLW-SVH, 2011 WL 1584107, at *6 (D.S.C. 3 April 27, 2011). In this case, the court finds it just to award Plaintiff the amount it would have charged Defendant to sublicense the Program, or $4,200. See Ex. 1, Gagliardi Aff. [DE-9-3J. With regard to enhanced damages, courts have considered the following factors in determining an appropriate amount: " 'repeated violations over an extended period of time; substantial unlawful monetary gains; significant actual damages to plaintiff; defendant's advertising for the intended broadcast of the event; and defendant's charging a cover charge or charging premiums for food and drinks.' "J&J Sports Prods., Inc. v. Lara Sport House Corp., No. 1:1O-cv-01369, 2011 WL 4345114, *6 (E.D.va. Aug. 26,2011 (quoting Kingvision Pay­ Per-View, Ltd v. Villalobos, 554 F. Supp.2d 375, 383 (N.D.N.Y. 2008)). Plaintiff requests enhanced damages in the amount of $100,000, an amount the court finds to be excessive in this case. Rather, considering the aforementioned factors in this case, including the fact that Defendant charged a cover charge and the need for deterrence of willful violations, the court finds that $10,000 in additional damages pursuant to § 605(e)(3)(C)(ii) to be just. Plaintiff also seeks attorneys fees and costs pursuant to § 605( e)(3)(B)(iii). In support of its request, Plaintiff submits the declaration ofits counsel, Jeremy Todd Browner [DE-9-1 J. The court finds the amount of attorneys fees requested, $1,101.50, to be reasonable. Plaintiff's request for attorneys fees and costs, therefore, is ALLOWED. As the court previously mentioned, Plaintiff also seeks additional damages under its state law claim for conversion. The court, however, finds that awarding such damages would amount to a double recovery, and therefore Plaintiffs' request for damages for conversion is DENIED. See J&J Sports Prods., Inc. v. Romenski, 845 F. Supp. 2d 703, 707 (W.D.N.C. 2012)("Plaintiff 4 may not recover conversion damages in addition to actual or statutory damages under Section 605.")(citingJoe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Dock Street Enters., Inc., No. 11-1973,2011 WL 6141058, at *5 n. 5 (D.Md. Dec. 8,2011); J &JSports Prod, Inc. v. J.R. 'Z Neighborhood Sports Grille, Inc., No. 9-3141, 2010 WL 1838432, at *2 (D.S.C. Apr. 5, 2010)). IV. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment [DE-9] is ALLOWED. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiff shall have and recover of Marino Esteban Diaz, Individually and d/b/a Velvet Room Bar and Lounge the amount of $14,200 in damages and $1,012.50 in attorneys fees, with interest accruing at the legal rate from the date of this judgment until paid. Plaintiff also is entitled to costs. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case. SO ORDERED. This the ~ day of November, 2012. ES C. FOX Senior United States District Judge J 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?