Glover-Armstead v. State of NC Durham PD/Sheriff Dept via Duke ER via Transport JUH

Filing 9

ORDER adopting 6 Memorandum and Recommendations and dismissing the complaint as frivolous. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 4/17/2013. A copy of the order was mailed to the pro se plaintiff. (Sawyer, D.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:12-CV-363-D SHARRON MARIE GLOVERARMSTEAD, JR., Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NC DURHAM PD, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER On March 21, 2013, Magistrate Judge Webb issued a Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R") [D.E. 6]. In that M&R, Judge Webb recommended that plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis be allowed, and that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed as frivolous. Neither party filed objections to the M&R. "The Federal Magistrates Act requires a district court to make a de novo determination of those portions of the [magistrate judge's] report or specified proposed fmdings or recommendations towhichobjectionismade." Diamond v. Colonial Life &Accident Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310,315 (4th Cir. 2005) (alteration in original) (emphasis and quotation omitted). Absent a timely objection, "a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Id. (quotation omitted). The court has reviewed the M&R and the record. The court is satisfied that there is no clear error on the face of the record. The court adopts the M&R. Plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED, and plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED as frivolous. The Clerk of Court shall close the case. SO ORDERED. This 1 '1 day of April2013. as"c: DE~rrt"<l.-'1 Chief United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?