Anderson v. Astrue

Filing 34

ORDER granting 33 Motion for Attorney Fees - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 05/10/2013. (Baker, C.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:12-cv-445-FL DONNIE ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN COL YIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, has executed this Consent Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of Social Security should pay the sum of $3,837.75 for attorney fees, in full and final settlement of all claims due against the Social Security Administration, for attorney fees and costs arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff's attorney $3,837.75 for attorney fees if there is no debt that qualifies under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716). Ifthere is such a debt, any fee remaining after offset will be payable to Plaintiff and delivered to Plaintiff's attorney. This )(JT~ day of j\1\% ,2013. CONSENTED TO: CHARLOTTE W. HALL Attorney for Plaintiff N.C. Bar# 41290 Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C. P.O. Box 10629 Raleigh, NC 27605 Telephone: (919) 791-1883 Fax: (919) 791-1886 charlotte@charleshallfirm.com JEANETTE M. MANDYCZ Attorney for Defendant Special Assistant United States Attorney Office ofthe General Counsel 6401 Security Boulevard Altmeyer Building, Room 617 Baltimore, MD 21235-6401 Telephone: (410)965-6471 Fax: (410)597-0137 Jeanette.mandycz@ssa.gov Maryland Bar

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?