Krausz Industries Ltd. v. Smith-Blair, Inc., et al

Filing 184

ORDER granting 163 Motion to Seal - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 7/15/2016. (Tripp, S.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Western Division No. 5:12-CV-00570-FL KRAUSZ INDUSTRIES LTD. f/k/a Krausz Metal Industries Ltd., Plaintiff, v. SMITH-BLAIR, INC., SENSUS USA, INC. and SENSUS MANUFACTURING SHANGHAI LIMITED, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Smith-Blair Inc.’s Motion to Seal Exhibits H and I to Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Support of It’s [sic] Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Defendants Smith-Blair, Inc. and Sensus USA, Inc. WHEREAS, the deposition testimony attached to Plaintiff Krausz Industries, Ltd.’s Memorandum in Support of It’s [sic] Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Defendants Smith-Blair, Inc. and Sensus USA, Inc. [DE 157] (the “Krausz Memorandum”) as Exhibits H and I contain non-public commercial information belonging to Smith-Blair, Inc. (“Smith-Blair”) concerning its acquisition of the 421 Top Bolt® products accused of infringement in this case and concerning its internal budgeting processes; and WHEREAS, the deposition testimony attached to the Krausz Memorandum as Exhibits H and I will be designated by Smith-Blair as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY” pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order in this case [DE 106]; and 1 WHEREAS, it appears to the Court that Smith-Blair claims, in good faith, that disclosure of the nonpublic commercial information contained in Exhibits H and I to the Krausz Memorandum could cause harm to Smith-Blair’s competitive position; and WHEREAS, it appears to the Court that Krausz believes that consideration of the information set forth in Exhibits H and I to the Krausz Memorandum is necessary for Krausz to present its pending motion to compel discovery; and WHEREAS, the public’s right to access to such information is outweighed by the interest which Smith-Blair claims in protecting against its public disclosure; and WHEREAS, the Court has provided notice to the public of Smith-Blair’s motion to seal; and WHEREAS, it appears that less restrictive alternatives to sealing would not be practical or adequate to preserve the confidentiality of the information in question; NOW, THEREFORE, upon consideration of Defendant Smith-Blair, Inc.’s Motion to Seal Exhibits H and I to Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Support of It’s [sic] Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Defendants Smith-Blair, Inc. and Sensus USA, Inc., the memorandum in support thereof, and the entire record herein, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Smith-Blair, Inc.’s Motion to Seal Exhibits H and I to Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Support of It’s [sic] Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Smith-Blair, Inc. and Sensus USA, Inc. is hereby GRANTED; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that Exhibits H and I to Plaintiff Krausz Industries, Ltd.’s Memorandum in Support of It’s [sic] Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Defendants Smith-Blair, Inc. and Sensus USA, Inc. [DE 157] be FILED UNDER SEAL. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?