Krausz Industries Ltd. v. Smith-Blair, Inc., et al
Filing
184
ORDER granting 163 Motion to Seal - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 7/15/2016. (Tripp, S.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Western Division
No. 5:12-CV-00570-FL
KRAUSZ INDUSTRIES LTD.
f/k/a Krausz Metal Industries Ltd.,
Plaintiff,
v.
SMITH-BLAIR, INC., SENSUS USA,
INC. and SENSUS MANUFACTURING
SHANGHAI LIMITED,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Smith-Blair Inc.’s Motion to Seal
Exhibits H and I to Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Support of It’s [sic] Motion to Compel
Production of Documents from Defendants Smith-Blair, Inc. and Sensus USA, Inc.
WHEREAS, the deposition testimony attached to Plaintiff Krausz Industries, Ltd.’s
Memorandum in Support of It’s [sic] Motion to Compel Production of Documents from
Defendants Smith-Blair, Inc. and Sensus USA, Inc. [DE 157] (the “Krausz Memorandum”) as
Exhibits H and I contain non-public commercial information belonging to Smith-Blair, Inc.
(“Smith-Blair”) concerning its acquisition of the 421 Top Bolt® products accused of
infringement in this case and concerning its internal budgeting processes; and
WHEREAS, the deposition testimony attached to the Krausz Memorandum as Exhibits H
and I will be designated by Smith-Blair as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE
COUNSEL ONLY” pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order in this case [DE 106]; and
1
WHEREAS, it appears to the Court that Smith-Blair claims, in good faith, that disclosure
of the nonpublic commercial information contained in Exhibits H and I to the Krausz
Memorandum could cause harm to Smith-Blair’s competitive position; and
WHEREAS, it appears to the Court that Krausz believes that consideration of the
information set forth in Exhibits H and I to the Krausz Memorandum is necessary for Krausz to
present its pending motion to compel discovery; and
WHEREAS, the public’s right to access to such information is outweighed by the interest
which Smith-Blair claims in protecting against its public disclosure; and
WHEREAS, the Court has provided notice to the public of Smith-Blair’s motion to seal;
and
WHEREAS, it appears that less restrictive alternatives to sealing would not be practical
or adequate to preserve the confidentiality of the information in question;
NOW, THEREFORE, upon consideration of Defendant Smith-Blair, Inc.’s Motion to
Seal Exhibits H and I to Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Support of It’s [sic] Motion to Compel
Production of Documents from Defendants Smith-Blair, Inc. and Sensus USA, Inc., the
memorandum in support thereof, and the entire record herein, it is hereby
ORDERED that Defendant Smith-Blair, Inc.’s Motion to Seal Exhibits H and I to
Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Support of It’s [sic] Motion to Compel Production of Documents
from Smith-Blair, Inc. and Sensus USA, Inc. is hereby GRANTED; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Exhibits H and I to Plaintiff Krausz Industries, Ltd.’s
Memorandum in Support of It’s [sic] Motion to Compel Production of Documents from
Defendants Smith-Blair, Inc. and Sensus USA, Inc. [DE 157] be FILED UNDER SEAL.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?