Blackwell v. Astrue

Filing 28

ORDER granting 20 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 24 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; and adopting 27 Memorandum and Recommendations - The court REMANDS to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405( g) for consideration of the Social Security Administration decision dated January 24, 2013 (DE 26-1 at 5-11), as set forth in the M&R (DE 27 at 10). Following remand, the Commissioner must return to this court to file any additional or modified findings and any transcript of additional record upon which the modification or affirmance of the prior decision is based, pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 10/22/2013. (Baker, C.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
No. 5:12-CV-651-FL

LENORA E. BLACKWELL,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”) of
United States Magistrate Judge James E. Gates, regarding the parties’ cross-motions for judgment
on the pleadings. No objections to the M&R have been filed, and the time within which to make any
objection has expired. This matter is ripe for ruling.
Upon careful review of the M&R and of the record generally, having found no clear error,
the court hereby ADOPTS the recommendation of the magistrate judge as its own. For the reasons
stated therein, the court GRANTS plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings (DE 20),
DENIES defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings (DE 24), and REMANDS to the
Commissioner pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for consideration of the Social
Security Administration decision dated January 24, 2013 (DE 26-1 at 5-11), as set forth in the M&R
(DE 27 at 10). Following remand, the Commissioner must return to this court to file any additional

or modified findings and any transcript of additional record upon which the modification or
affirmance of the prior decision is based, pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
SO ORDERED this the 22nd day of October, 2013.

______________________________
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN
United States District Judge

2