United States of America v. Fofanah-Balde Miscellaneous Personal Property et al

Filing 9

DEFAULT JUDGMENT as to all defendants signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 3/29/2013. (Sawyer, D.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION NO. 5:12-CV-684-D UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FOFANAH-BALDE MISCELLANEOUS PERSONAL PROPERTY AND $14.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, Defendants. DEFAULT JUDGMENT This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment. It appearing that a copy of the Complaint herein was served upon the potential claimants of the defendants and that publication Supplemental Rule has G ( 4), been and, duly thus, made, that in due accordance notice was with given accordingly, the Court finds that: 1. Process was duly issued in this cause and the defendants (fully described in Attachment A to the Declaration of Special Agent Stanley Crowder in the Complaint) were duly seized by the U. S. Secret Service pursuant to said process; 2. defendants law; and No nor entitled answer persons have filed any regarding them within the claim time to the fixed by 3. The well-plead allegations of the Complaint in respect to the defendants are taken as admitted, as no one has appeared to deny the same. Based upon the above findings, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. Default judgment be and the same is hereby entered against the defendants; 2. All persons claiming any right, title, or interest in or to the said defendants are held in default; 3. The defendants are forfeited to the United States of America; 4. Entry # 5. This 8 Court entered Default in this action at Docket and The U. S. Secret Service is hereby directed to dispose of the defendants according to law. SO ORDERED this 11 day of _____.M~a.,_._rc=:..::.h...!....-- _ _ _ , 2 o13 . JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?