Gage v. Astrue
Filing
29
CONSENT ORDER granting 28 Consent Motion for Attorney Fees - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 04/29/2013. (Baker, C.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DNISION
No. 5:12-CV-711-FL
MEDGER GAGE,
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
vs.
)
)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of
Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
CONSENT ORDER
)
)
This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the
parties and it appearing that the Plaintiff, by his attorney, has executed this Consent Order and
the Defendant, by the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, has executed this Consent
Order; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Defendant should pay the sum of
$4,979.93, in full and final settlement of all claims against the Social Security Administration,
for attorney fees and costs arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C.
§ 2412(d).
It is therefore ORDERED that the Defendant pay to the Plaintiff the sum of$4,979.93,
sent to the Plaintiffs Counsel's office address, in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising
under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and upon the payment of such sum, this case is dismissed
with prejudice.
This;;ff~day of
A'PRll-
2013.
CONSENTED TO:
CHARLOTTE W. HALL
Attorney for the Plaintiff
Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C.
P.O. Box 10629
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
Telephone: (919) 791-1883
Fax: (919) 971-1886
Email: charlotte@charleshallfirm.com
PETER A. HEINLEIN
Attorney for the Defendant
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
Office of the General Counsel
Room 617, Altmeyer Building
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland 21235
Telephone: (410) 965-2350
Fax: (410) 597-0137
E-mail: Peter.Heinlein@ssa.gov
Maryland Bar
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?