Yates v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Inc., et al

Filing 126

ORDER granting #123 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Discovery; granting #124 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Discovery; and granting #125 Motion to Dismiss Defendant Yarway Corporation - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 06/05/2013. (Baker, C.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION NO. 5:12-CV-752-FL GRAHAM YATES and BECKY YATES, Plaintiffs, v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., individually and as successor-in-interest to The Del aval Separator Company; ALPA LAVAL, INC.; ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC.; BORGWARNER MORSE TEC, INC., individually and as successor-in-interest to Borg-Warner Corporation; CBS CORPORATION; CRANE CO.; CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC., individually and as successor-in-interest to Mundet Cork Company; DANA COMPANIES LLC; ELLIOTT TURBO MACHINERY COMPANY; FLOWSERVE US INC., individually and as successor-in-interest to Edward Valve, Inc.; FMC CORPORATION, individually and as successor-in-interest to Northern Pump Company; FORD MOTOR COMPANY; FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION; THE GATES CORPORATION; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; HOBART BROTHERS COMPANY; HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., successor-ininterest to Bendix Corporation; HOPEMAN BROTHERS INC.; IMO INDUSTRIES, INC., individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Turbine, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER Inc.; JOHN CRANE, INC.; MCNALLY INDUSTRIES, LLC, individually and as successor-in-interest to Northern Fire Apparatus Company; METRO PO LIT AN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; UNICOAT SALES LLC, individually and as successor-in-interest to KST Coatings LLC; UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION; VELANVALVE CORPORATION; WARREN PUMPS LLC; WEIR VLAVES & CONTROLS USA, INC., THE WILLIAM POWELL COMPANY; and, YARWAY CORPORATION, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants. This matter comes before the court on joint motion of plaintiffs and defendant Yarway Corporation to dismiss without prejudice all claims against defendant Yarway Corporation pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (DE 125). For cause shown, it is hereby ordered that the joint motion to dismiss is GRANTED (DE 125), and the claims of plaintiffs against defendant Yarway Corporation are hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice. Also before the court are two motions for extension of time to respond to discovery (DE 123, 124), made by defendants Borg-W amer Morse Tee, Inc. and General Electric Company, respectively. As they have obtained consent and shown good cause, defendants' motions to extend discovery response time are GRANTED (DE 123, 124). 2 ~H SO ORDERED, this the.:J _ day of June, 2013. _ ~:$4.~ r: I W. FLANAGAN United States District Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?