Brissett, et al v. Shoaf Law Firm, P.A., et al

Filing 29

ORDER granting 27 Consent Motion to Stay - All deadlines are hereby stayed pending the Court's ruling on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 08/16/2013. (Baker, C.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No. 5:12-CV-781-FL COURTNAY T. BRISSETT and LADWIN BRISSETT, Plaintiffs, v. SHOAF LAW FIRM, P.A. and RYAN D. SHOAF, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER Upon Motion by the Defendants, Shoaf Law Firm, P .A. and Ryan D. Shoaf, by and through counsel, to stay all deadlines in this matter and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1_ Defendants' motion is GRANTED and all deadlines are hereby stayed pending the Court's ruling on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Defendants' motion is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. -I\ This the~ day of A u&us-r '2013.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?