Greene v. Astrue
ORDER GRANTING WITH MODIFICATIONS 39 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees. The award will be reduced based on the unreasonableness of upholding the contingency fee agreement. Accordingly, the plaintiff's counsel shall be awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $10,000.00, and the plaintiff's counsel is ordered to refund to the plaintiff the smaller EAJA fee of $3,662.50. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 6/9/2014. (Fisher, M.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
JOSEPH A. GREENE,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Plaintiffs counsel has moved for attorney's fees and costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)
[DE 39]. For the reasons stated herein, counsel's motion is GRANTED
Plaintiffs counsel seeks fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Section 406(b)(l) allows
the Court to award a "reasonable fee" of up to twenty-five percent of the past-due benefits paid
to the plaintiff. The government does not take a position on the matter, but has briefed the Court
as an aid to its decision-making.
Plaintiff and counsel entered into a fee agreement which stated in relevant part:
I agree that my attorney shall charge and receive as the fee an amount equal to
twenty-five percent (25%) of the past-due benefits that are awarded to my family
and me in the event my case is won .... My attorney has explained to me that it
is the law that the attorney fee must be approved by the Federal Court for
representation in federal court and by the Social Security Administration for
representation before the Social Security Administration.
In further support of his application for fees, counsel has submitted documentation recording
29.3 hours ofwork related to the representation ofplaintiffbefore this Court.
Section 406(b)( 1) of the Social Security Act allows this Court to award a reasonable fee.
This fee is payable out of, rather than in addition to, the past-due benefits recovered by the
plaintiff. 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). It is well recognized that in many cases a reasonable fee may be
less than the maximum figure of twenty-five percent of past-due benefits. See Redden v.
Celebrezze, 370 F.2d 373, 376 (4th Cir. 1966).
Counsel and the claimant he represents remain free to negotiate fee agreements, as long
as these agreements fall within the guidelines established by 406(b). See Gisbrecht v. Barnhart,
535 U.S. 789, 792-93 (2002). Thus, in situations where the claimant and counsel have negotiated
a fee agreement the district court serves as an independent evaluator of the reasonableness of the
resultant fee. Specifically, the Court will review fee arrangements "to assure that they yield
reasonable results in particular cases." !d. at 807. In assessing whether the contingency
arrangement is reasonable a court may consider reducing a fee award where the benefits awarded
are large in comparison to the amount of time expended by the attorney. !d. at 808.
Under the circumstances of this case, the Court finds that an award of $33,789.50 yields
an unreasonable result. This case was a relatively straightforward social security claim, and the
time recorded in handling this matter was substantial, but does not reflect an extraordinary
investment of time in a social security matter. Were the court to award the full amount requested
it would be equivalent to counsel charging $1,153.23 per hour; this reflects a fee that would
constitute a windfall in counsel's favor and against Mr. Greene's interest. The Court finds that a
fee of $10,000 is reasonable and includes a premium for the risk taken on by counsel in
representing plaintiff on a contingent fee basis. See Cooper v. Astrue, 2012 WL 2872446, *3
(E.D.N.C. July 12, 2012).
For the foregoing reasons, plaintiffs motion for attorney's fees under 406(b)(1) is
GRANTED, but the award will be reduced based on the unreasonableness of upholding
the contingency fee agreement. Accordingly, plaintiffs counsel shall be awarded
attorney's fees in the amount of $10,000 for the reasons stated above. Further, plaintiffs
counsel is ORDERED to refund to plaintiff, the smaller EAJA fee of $3,662.50
_j_ day of June, 2014.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?