Scott v. Anderson et al

Filing 14

ORDER granting 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Defendant Anderson is dismissed. The Court also grants in part and denies in part 13 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint. Plaintiff cannot add Jadacris as a defendan t. Plaintiff is allowed to add R.T.I International as a defendant. The Court will treat the Amended Complaint as the operative complaint. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 5/16/2013. A copy of the order was mailed to the pro se plaintiff. (Sawyer, D.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:13-CV-60-D YOLANDA DENISE SCOTT, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ~ MIKIO ANDERSON, and GREEN RESOURCES, INC., Defendants. ORDER ) ) ) ) ) On April4, 2013, defendant Mikio Anderson filed a motion to dismiss the Title Vll claims that plaintiff filed against him [D.E. 10]. Anderson cannot be liable under Title Vll. See,~. Lissau v. S. Food Serv.. Inc., 159 F.3d 177, 181 (4th Cir. 1998). The motion to dismiss [D.E. 10] is GRANTED, and Anderson is DISMISSED as a defendant. Plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint [D.E. 13], which seeks to add Sara Jadacris and R.T.I. International as defendants, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff cannot add Jadacris as a defendant. See Lissau, 159 F.3d at 181. The court permits her to add R.T.I. International as a defendant. Plaintiff is responsible for properly serving the new defendant. The court will treat the amended complaint as the operative complaint. SO ORDERED. This~dayofMay2013. ~SC.DEVERill Chief United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?