Holmes v. The Smithfield Packing Company, Incorporated

Filing 16

ORDER - The court has been advised that the parties have settled all matters in controversy among them. Therefore, this matter is DISMISSED subject to the right of any party to file a motion to reopen the case should settlement not be consummated wit hin forty-five (45) days hereof. The parties are directed to file their Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice on or before Friday, July 12, 2013. As there appears to be no further reason at this time to maintain the file as an open one for statistical purposes, this case is removed from the active docket. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 05/28/2013. (Baker, C.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:13-CV-105-FL MICHAEL EDWARD HOLMES, Plaintiff, v. SMITHFIELD PACKING COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER The court has been advised that the parties have settled all matters in controversy among them. Therefore, this matter is DISMISSED subject to the right of any party to file a motion to reopen the case should settlement not be consummated within forty-five (45) days hereof. The parties are directed to file their Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice on or before Friday, July 12, 2013. As there appears to be no further reason at this time to maintain the file as an open one for statistical purposes, this case is removed from the active docket. rJBTH SO ORDERED, this0 __ day of May, 2013. ~-.4.~ L :FLANAGAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?