Adams v. Regional Credit Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 11

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 10 Motion for Entry of Default. Entry of Default is hereby entered against Defendants Scudder and Northern Resolution Group, LLC. Entry of Default is denied as to Defendant Regional Credit Solutions, Inc. Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 5/22/2013. (Sawyer, D.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:13-CV-128-D TAKISHA ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. REGIONAL CREDIT SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER On February 21, 2013, Takisha Adams ("plaintiff') filed this action against defendants Regional Credit Solutions, Inc. ("Regional"), William Scudder ("Scudder"), and Northern Resolution Group, LLC ("Northern") [D.E. 1]. On April 23, 2013, plaintiff moved for entry of default against each defendant [D.E. 10]. For the reasons stated, plaintiffs motion for entry of default is granted in part and denied in part [D.E. 10]. Rule 55( a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides for entry of default against a party who "has failed to plead or otherwise defend." According to plaintiff, Northern was served with summons and the complaint on February 25, 2013 [D.E. 7], and service of process was perfected as to Scudder on March 4, 2013 [D.E. 8]. Northern and Scudder have failed to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiffs complaint. Accordingly, plaintiffs motion for entry of default against defendants William Scudder and Northern Resolution Group, LLC is GRANTED [D.E. 10]. As for Regional, plaintiff did not file a return of service or otherwise demonstrate that this defendant was served with summons and the complaint. Thus, plaintiffs motion for entry of default against defendant Regional Credit Solutions, Inc. is DENIED [D.E. 10]. tJ, SO ORDERED. This'}) day of May 2013. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?