Communications Supply Corporation v. Walbridge Company et al
Filing
23
ORDER granting 18 Motion for Entry of Default. Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 6/28/2013. (Sawyer, D.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
No. 5:13-CV-183-D
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel.
COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLY
CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
V.
WALBRIDGE COMPANY, a/k/a
WALBRIDGE ALDINGER COMPANY;
COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS, LLC;
TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY
COMPANY OF AMERICA; and LIBERTY
MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ENTRY OF DEFAULT
On March 13, 2013, the United States of America, ex. rei Communications Supply
Corporation ("plaintiff') initiated this action against defendants Walbridge Company, Command
Communications, LLC, and John Doe Surety [D.E. 1]. On March 15,2013, plaintiff filed a first
amended complaint naming as defendants Walbridge Company a/k/a Walbridge Aldinger Company,
Command Communications, LLC, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, and Liberty
Mutual Insurance Company [D .E. 8]. On May 1, 2013, plaintiff moved for entry of default against
Command Communications, LLC [D.E. 18]. For the reasons stated, plaintiffs motion for entry of
default is granted [D.E. 18].
According to plaintiff, Command Communications, LLC was served with summons and the
original and first amended complaints on March 21, 2013 [D.E. 17, D.E. 18]. Command
Communications, LLC has not filed an answer or response to plaintiffs complaint, and the time
within which defendant may do so has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A). Rule 55(a) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides for entry of default against a party who "has failed to
plead or otherwise defend." Accordingly, plaintiffs motion for entry of default against defendant
Command Communications, LLC is GRANTED [D.E. 18].
so ORDERED.
h-
This
J..i
day of June 2013.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?