Whittington v. Colvin

Filing 40

The court ADOPTS the recommendation of the magistrate judge as its own. For the reasons stated therein, the court GRANTS plaintiff's 24 motion for judgment on the pleadings, DENIES defendant's 27 motion for judgment on the pleadings, and REMANDS this case to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further proceedings as set forth in the Memorandum and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/4/2014. (Castania, M.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:13-CV-243-FL HAROLD B. WHITTINGTON, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER This matter is before the court on the Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge James E. Gates, regarding the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings. No objections to the M&R have been filed, and the time within which to make any objection has expired. This matter is ripe for ruling. Upon careful review of the M&R and of the record generally, having found no clear error, the court hereby ADOPTS the recommendation of the magistrate judge as its own. For the reasons stated therein, the court GRANTS plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, DENIES defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, and REMANDS this case to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further proceedings as set forth in the M&R (DE 39 at 10-16). Following remand, the Commissioner must return to this court to file any additional or modified findings and any transcript of additional record upon which the modification or affirmance of the prior decision is based, pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). SO ORDERED this the 4th day of August, 2014. ______________________________ LOUISE W. FLANAGAN United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?