Rice v. Colvin
Filing
28
ORDER granting 27 Motion for Attorney Fees - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 09/23/2013. (Baker, C.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
No. 5:13-cv-259-FL
JAMES RICE,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CONSENT ORDER
This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the
parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, has executed this Consent
Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Special
Assistant United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the
Commissioner of Social Security should pay the sum of $3,138.44 for attorney fees, in full and
final settlement of all claims due against the Social Security Administration, for attorney fees
and costs arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff, the
sum of $3,138.44 in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. §
2412(d), and upon the payment of such sum this case is dismissed with prejudice.
23rd
September
This _____ day of ___________, 2013.
_________________________________
United States District Judge
CONSENTED TO:
CHARLOTTE W. HALL
Attorney for Plaintiff
N.C. Bar # 41290
Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C.
P.O. Box 10629
Raleigh, NC 27605
Telephone: (919) 791-1883
Fax: (919) 791-1886
charlotte@charleshallfirm.com
ROBERT CROWE
Attorney for Defendant
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Room 617, Altmeyer Building
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland 21235
Tel: 410-965-3155
Fax: 410-597-0514
email: bob.crowe@ssa.gov
Mass. Bar No. 106940
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?