Tomlin v. Colvin

Filing 39

ORDER granting 37 Consent Motion for Attorney Fees - Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 10/28/2014. (Tripp, S.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:13-cv-276-D VIOLA TOMLIN, Plaintiff, v. ) ) ) ) ) CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through her attorney, has executed this Consent Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of Social Security should pay the sum of $4,208.75 for attorney fees, in full and final settlement of all claims due against the Social Security Administration, for attorney fees and costs arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiffs attorney $4,208.75 for attorney fees if there is no debt that qualifies under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716). If there is such a debt, any fee remaining after offset will be payable to Plaintiff and delivered to Plaintiffs attorney. SO ORDERED. This l.8 day of October 2014. Chief United States District Judge CONSENTED TO: /s/CHARLOTTE W. HALL Attorney for Plaintiff N.C. Bar # 41290 Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C. P.O. Box 10629 Raleigh, NC 27605 Telephone: (919) 791-1883 Fax: (919) 791-1886 /s/LEO R. MONTENEGRO Attorney for Defendant Special Assistant United States Attorney Room 655, Altmeyer Building 6401 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21235 Telephone: (410) 965-3153 Fax: (410) 597-0527 New York Bar

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?