Barley v. Garrett
Filing
34
JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court's orders entered May 1, 2013 and June 19, 2013, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, that plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order is denied, plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction is denied, defendants' motion to dismiss is granted, and defendants' alternative motion for summary judgment is denied. Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 06/20/2013. (Baker, C.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
JESSE E. BARLEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
LIEUTENANT GENERAL WILLIAM
GARRETT Commanding General, U.S.
Army Forces Command, and JOHN
McHUGH Secretary of the U.S. Army, and
their Duly Authorized Representatives and
Successors in Office, in their Official
Capacity,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
JUDGMENT
No. 5:13-CV-293-FL
Decision by Court.
This action came before the Honorable Louise W. Flanagan, United States District Judge, for
consideration of the plaintiff’s motions for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction
and defendants’ motion to dismiss, or in the alternative for summary judgment.
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court’s orders entered
May 1, 2013 and June 19, 2013, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, that plaintiff’s
motion for temporary restraining order is denied, plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction is
denied, defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and defendants’ alternative motion for summary
judgment is denied.
This Judgment Filed and Entered on June 20, 2013, and Copies To:
Mark L. Waple (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)
Neal Fowler (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)
June 20, 2013
JULIE A. RICHARDS, CLERK
/s/ Christa N. Baker
(By) Christa N. Baker, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?