Barley v. Garrett

Filing 34

JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court's orders entered May 1, 2013 and June 19, 2013, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, that plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order is denied, plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction is denied, defendants' motion to dismiss is granted, and defendants' alternative motion for summary judgment is denied. Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 06/20/2013. (Baker, C.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION JESSE E. BARLEY, Plaintiff, v. LIEUTENANT GENERAL WILLIAM GARRETT Commanding General, U.S. Army Forces Command, and JOHN McHUGH Secretary of the U.S. Army, and their Duly Authorized Representatives and Successors in Office, in their Official Capacity, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT No. 5:13-CV-293-FL Decision by Court. This action came before the Honorable Louise W. Flanagan, United States District Judge, for consideration of the plaintiff’s motions for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction and defendants’ motion to dismiss, or in the alternative for summary judgment. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court’s orders entered May 1, 2013 and June 19, 2013, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, that plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order is denied, plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction is denied, defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and defendants’ alternative motion for summary judgment is denied. This Judgment Filed and Entered on June 20, 2013, and Copies To: Mark L. Waple (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) Neal Fowler (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) June 20, 2013 JULIE A. RICHARDS, CLERK /s/ Christa N. Baker (By) Christa N. Baker, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?