Kebort v. Colvin

Filing 33

CONSENT ORDER regarding 32 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 8/8/2014. (Marsh, K)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:13-cv-340-BO SHARON KEBORT, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) v. ) CAROLYN COL YIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER ) Defendant. ) This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through her attorney, has executed this Consent Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of Social Security should pay the sum of$3,145.00 for attorney fees arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). It also appearing that Plaintiffs counsel should be reimbursed the $400.00 filing fee from the Treasury Judgment Fund. It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff the sum of$3,145.00 in attorney fees and the Treasury Judgment Fund reimburse Plaintiffs counsel the $400.00 filing fee in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412( d), and upon the payment of such sum this case is dismissed with prejudice. This_!dayof AFOl4 CONSENTED TO: CHARLOTTE W. HALL Attorney for Plaintiff N.C. Bar# 41290 Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C. P.O. Box 10629 Raleigh, NC 27605 Telephone: (919) 791-1883 Fax: (919) 791-1886 DENNIS FOLEY Attorney for Defendant Virginia State Bar #39115 Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel Altmeyer Building Room 617 640 I Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21235-6401 Telephone: (410) 965-3161 Fax: (410) 597-0137 Dennis.F

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?