Justice v. Farley et al

Filing 84

JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court DENIES plaintiff's motions to resolve the issue of service [D.E. 64], for extension of time to complete service [D.E. 71], for costs [D.E. 65], and for entry of default [D.E. 76]. The court GRANTS plaintiff's motion to amend [D.E. 49], and DISMISSES plaintiff's claims against defendant Richards and DISMISSES Richards as a defendant. The court GRANTS defendants' motions to dismiss [D.E. 37, 39, 43, 50, 52, 54, 57, 60], DEN IES AS MOOT defendants' motions to stay discovery [D.E. 74, 77] and plaintiff's motion for scheduling order, discovery conference, and to compel [D.E. 80]. The Court DISMISSES the complaint and amended complaint. Signed by Debby Sawyer, Deputy Clerk for Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 1/21/2014. A copy of the judgment was mailed to the pro se plaintiff. (Sawyer, D.)

United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
THEODORE JUSTICE for son
Plaintiff,

)
)
)
v.
)
)
DR. TIMOTHY FARLEY, Granville County
)
School Superintendent, MARY WATSON,
)
Director Exceptional Children, AUGUSTUS B.
)
ELKINS, Administrative Law Judge,
)
HONORABLE JULIAN MANN III,
)
Administrative Law Judge, AMY MILLER,
)
Program Director Exceptional Children, MICHAEL )
ALLEN, Director Exceptional Children, KATHY )
TWISDALE, Principal Stovall Shaw Elementary, )
ROBYNN WILLIAMS, Special Education
)
Teacher, JAMES E. CROSS, JR., Attorney
)
Granville County Schools, DALE W. HENSLEY, )
Attorney Granville County Schools, KATE
)
NEALE, Consultant for Dispute Resolution
)
Department of Public Instruction Exceptional
)
Children Division, and JULIE A. RICHARDS,
)
Clerk of Court,
)
Defendants.
)

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
CASE NO. 5:13-CV-343-D

Decision by the Court:
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court DENIES plaintiff’s motions to resolve
the issue of service [D.E. 64], for extension of time to complete service [D.E. 71], for costs [D.E. 65],
and for entry of default [D.E. 76]. The court GRANTS plaintiffs motion to amend [D.E. 49], and
DISMISSES plaintiff’s claims against defendant Richards and DISMISSES Richards as a defendant.
The court GRANTS defendants' motions to dismiss [D.E. 37, 39, 43, 50, 52, 54, 57, 60], DENIES
AS MOOT defendants' motions to stay discovery [D.E. 74, 77] and plaintiff’s motion for scheduling
order, discovery conference, and to compel [ D.E. 80]. The Court DISMISSES the complaint and
amended complaint.
THE ABOVE JUDGMENT WAS ENTERED TODAY, JANUARY 21, 2014 WITH A
COPY TO:
Theodore Justice, Pro se (via USPS to PO Box 232, Ridgeway, NC 27570)
John Corriher (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)
Tiffany Y. Lucas (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)
Susannah P. Holloway (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)
January 21, 2014
Date
Raleigh, North Carolina

JULIE A. RICHARDS, Clerk
Eastern District of North Carolina
/s/ Debby Sawyer
Page 1 of 2