UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $200,020.00 in U. S. Currency
Filing
10
DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA against $200,020.00 in U. S. Currency. Signed by Senior Judge W. Earl Britt on 3/20/2014. (Marsh, K)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
NO. 5:13-CV-436-BR
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
$200,020.00 IN U. S. CURRENCY,)
)
Defendant.
)
DEFAULT JUDGMENT
________________________________________________________________
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for
Default Judgment.
It appearing that a copy of the Complaint
herein was served upon the defendant and that publication has
been duly made, in accordance with Supplemental Rule G(4), and,
thus, that due notice was given accordingly, the Court finds
that:
1.
Process was duly issued in this cause and the defendant
was duly seized by the U. S. Marshal’s Service pursuant to said
process;
2.
No entitled persons have filed any claim to the
defendant nor answer regarding them within the time fixed by law;
and
3.
The well-plead allegations of the Complaint in respect
to the defendant are taken as admitted, as no one has appeared to
deny the same.
Based upon the above findings, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
1.
Default judgment be and the same is hereby entered
against the defendant;
2.
All persons claiming any right, title, or interest in or
to the said defendant are held in default;
3.
The defendant is forfeited to the United States of
America;
4.
This Court entered Default in this action at Docket
Entry # 9;
5.
The U. S. Department of Justice is hereby directed to
dispose of the defendant according to law; and
6.
Upon the entry of this judgment, the Clerk of Court is
DIRECTED to close this case.
This 20 March 2014.
_________________________
W. Earl Britt
Senior U.S. District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?