Johnson v. Colvin

Filing 31

ORDER GRANTING 30 Motion for Attorney Fees. The Commissioner is hereby ordered to pay the sum of $2,848.02 for attorney fees. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 4/18/2014. (Fisher, M.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION 5: 13-CV-458-BO TERRIE F. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER ) ) This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through her attorney, has executed this Consent Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney; and it appearing that the patiies have agreed that the Commissioner of Social Security should pay the sum of $2,848.02 for attorney fees, in full and final settlement of all claims due against the Social Security Administration, for attorney fees and costs arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). The Court hereby awards Plaintiff $2,848.02 in attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (28 U.S.C. § 2412(c) and (d)), paid to Plaintiff's attorney if there is no debt that qualifies under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716). Ifthere is such a debt, any fee remaining after offset will be payable to Plaintiff and delivered to Plaintiff's attorney. This J%day of~ , 2014. CONSENTED TO: DERRICK KYLE ARROWOOD Attorney for Plaintiff N.C. Bar# 41075 Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C. P.O. Box I 0629 Raleigh, NC 27605 Telephone: (919) 791-1883 Fax: (919) 791-1886 TODD J. LEWELLEN Attorney for Defendant Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel Altmeyer Building Room 617 6401 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21235-6401 Telephone: (41 0) 965-3309 Facsimile: (410) 597-0137 E-mail: Maryland Bar

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?