Graham v. Colvin

Filing 30

ORDER GRANTING 29 Consent Motion for Attorney Fees. The Commissioner is ordered to pay the sum of $4,208.75 and the Treasure Judgment Fund to pay $400.00 in full satisfaction of all EAJA claims. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 11/17/2014. (Fisher, M.)

Download PDF
" IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:13-cv-624-BO CLARETHER BEST GRAHAM, Plaintiff, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER ) ) ) ) Defendant. ) This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through her attorney, has executed this Consent Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of Social Security should pay the sum of $4,208.75 for attorney fees and that the Treasury Judgment Fund should pay $400.00 arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 u.s.c. § 24l2(d). It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay the sum of $4,208.75 and the Treasury Judgment Fund pay to Plaintiff's counsel $400.00 in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under EAJA, 28 U .S.C. § 2412( d), and upon the payment of such sums this case is dismissed with prejudice. This i1__ day ofN~ol4. . CONSENTED TO: CHARLOTTE W. HALL Attorney for Plaintiff N.C. Bar# 41290 Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C. P.O. Box 10629 Raleigh, NC 27605 Telephone: (919) 791-1883 Fax: (919) 791-1886 charlotte@charleshallfirm .com MARC EPSTEIN Attorney for Defendant Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration Office ofthe General Counsel 640 I Security Boulevard Altmeyer Building, Room 642 Baltimore, MD 21235-6401 Telephone: 410-965-8122 Facsimile: 410-597-0527 New York Bar

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?