Seng v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Filing 11

ORDER GRANTING 8 Defendant's Agreed Motion to Stay the Action. This action is stayed pending a determination by the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation of the pending Motion for Transfer and Consolidation of Related Actions to the Dis trict of Rhode Island. Counsel shall immediately file with this Court any Orders from the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation pertaining to this action. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for administrative purposes. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 10/28/2013. Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff via US Mail. (Fisher, M.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA PAUL N. SENG, ) ) Plaintiff v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 5:13-cv-699-BO ORDER GRANTING CONSENT MOTION TO STAY THE ACTION PENDING RESOLUTION BY THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTI-DISTRICT LITIGATION OF THE PENDING MOTION TO TRANSFER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant's Agreed to Motion to Stay the Action Pending Resolution by the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation of Plaintiffs Pending Motion to Transfer ("Motion To Stay"). After due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion to Stay is hereby GRANTED as follows: 1. This action is stayed pending a determination by the Judicial Panel on MultiDistrict Litigation of the pending Motion For Transfer And Consolidation OF Related Actions To The District Of Rhode Island Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 28 u.s.c. 1407. 2. Counsel shall immediately file with this Court any Orders from the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation pertaining to this action. 3. The Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE this case for administrative purposes. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Raleigh, North Carolina this October, 2013. d- r'day of

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?