Henderson v. McKenzie, et al

Filing 25

AMENDED JUDGMENT in favor of Rosen & Saba, LLP, Schmid & Voiles, Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., Adela Carrasco, David McKenzie, James Rosen, Kathleen McColgan, Kim Russo - Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 10/02/2014. (Baker, C.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION GLENN HENDERSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SONY PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT; ) DAVID McKENZIE; KIM RUSSO; ) SCMHMID & VOILES; KATHLEEN ) McCOLGAN, ESQ.; ROSEN & SABA, ) LLP; JAMES ROSEN, ESQ.; and ADELA ) CARRASCO, ESQ. ) ) Defendants. ) AMENDED JUDGMENT No. 5:14-CV-29-FL Decision by Court. This action came before the Honorable Louise W. Flanagan, United States District Judge. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court’s order entered September 24, 2014, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, that the defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted. With all claims arising in this case having been dismissed, the plaintiff shall have and recover nothing from this action. Further, pursuant to the court’s order entered October 2, 2014, Plaintiff is enjoined from filing in this district any lawsuit against Defendants Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc.; Kim Russo; Schmid & Voiles; Kathleen McColgan; James Rosen; Rosen Saba LLP; Adela Carasco; David McKenzie; and/or against Sands Anderson PC which lawsuit involves claims related to, or arising out of, Henderson’s employment with and/or termination from defendant Sony, or any litigation related thereto, included all matters addressed in any prior North Carolina case, state or federal, without leave of court. This Judgment Filed and Entered on October 2, 2014, and Copies To: David Loar McKenzie (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) Glenn Henderson (via U.S. Mail) 5952 Cliffdale Road, Fayetteville, NC 28314 October 2, 2014 JULIE A. RICHARDS, CLERK /s/ Christa N. Baker (By) Christa N. Baker, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?