Harshman v. Colvin
CONSENT ORDER granting 39 Motion for Attorney Fees - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/16/2014. (Baker, C.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of
This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the
parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, has executed this Consent
Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant
United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of
Social Security should pay the sum of $2,698.13 for attorney fees, in full and final settlement of
all claims due against the Social Security Administration, for attorney fees and costs arising
under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
The Court hereby awards Plaintiff $2,698.13 in attorney fees under the Equal Access to
Justice Act (28 U.S.C. § 2412(c) and (d)), in full and final settlement of all claims due against the
Social Security Administration, paid to Plaintiff’s attorney if there is no debt that qualifies under
the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716). If there is such a debt, any fee remaining after
offset will be payable to Plaintiff and delivered to Plaintiff’s attorney.
This ___ day of ___________, 2014.
United States District Judge
DERRICK KYLE ARROWOOD
Attorney for Plaintiff
N.C. Bar # 41075
Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C.
P.O. Box 10629
Raleigh, NC 27605
Telephone: (919) 791-1883
Fax: (919) 791-1886
MARC D. EPSTEIN
Attorney for Defendant
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
Office of the General Counsel
Altmeyer Building Room 642
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, MD 21235-6401
Telephone: (410) 965-8122
Facsimile: (410) 597-0527
New York Bar
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?