Kyle, et al v. McDougall, et al
ORDER regarding 14 Motion to Stay Briefing on Motion to Transfer Case or, Alternatively, Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Transfer Case - Having considered the issues presented, the court finds good cause to GRANT plaint iffs' motion in the alternative for an extension. Plaintiffs shall have until May 28, 2014, to respond to defendants' motion to transfer. Accordingly, plaintiffs request for stay is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 04/28/2014. (Baker, C.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
GRANT A. KYLE and BLUGUISE,
TECHNOLOGY FUSION, LLC; and
TEK FUSION GLOBAL, INC.,
This matter comes before the court on plaintiffs’ motion to stay briefing on defendants’
motion to transfer case, or, alternatively, for an extension of time to respond to defendants’ motion.
(DE 14). The motion states that defendants oppose the request for stay, but do not oppose plaintiffs’
request for an extension of time.
Having considered the issues presented, the court finds good cause to GRANT plaintiffs’
motion in the alternative for an extension. Plaintiffs shall have until May 28, 2014, to respond to
defendants’ motion to transfer. Accordingly, plaintiffs’ request for stay is DENIED.
SO ORDERED, this the 28th day of April, 2014.
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?