Corporate Web Solutions, Ltd v. Sageworks, Inc.
Filing
70
ORDER granting in part 60 Motion to Compel - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/24/2014. (Baker, C.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
CORPORATE WEB SOLUTIONS,
LTD.,
Plaintiff,
v.
SAGEWORKS, INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No.: 5:14-CV-222-FL
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL IN PART
This matter came before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (“Motion”)
filed on December 8, 2014. Defendant responded on December 12, 2014. The Court held
a hearing on December 16, 2014. Based on the Motion, Memorandum in Support,
materials submitted therewith, argument of counsel, and other matters of record before
the Court, the Court finds and concludes that the Motion should be GRANTED in part.
Specifically, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that on or before January 5, 2014,
Defendant shall produce, subject to a protective order to be entered by the Court, the
information and items requested by Plaintiff in its Requests for Production Nos. 13 and
14, including the complete source code for all versions of the software programs of
Defendant in which Plaintiff’s .netCHARTING software has been used, and the source
code repository logs from its TortoiseSVN source code repository.
It is further ORDERED, that Defendant shall provide a sworn statement by a
custodian of records with personal knowledge describing the specific steps that have been
taken to search for emails and other electronic records available to Defendant that may be
responsive to Plaintiff’s discovery requests, as well as any efforts to reconstruct such
items from sources available to Defendant.
24th
December
So ORDERED this the _____ day of _____________, 2014.
__________________________________________
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?