Sutton v. North Carolina State Bar

Filing 77

JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that defendants' motions to dismiss are ALLOWED. Defendants' motions to stay the order for a discovery plan are DENIED as moot. Plaintiff's motions are DENIED. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This case is closed. Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 9/12/2014. (Marsh, K)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION

David Campbell Sutton,
Plaintiff,
v.
The North Carolina State Bar, Mary Winstead,
Carmen Bannon, Fred Morelock, Irvin Hankins,
Karen Ray, Wayne Truax, Katherine Jean,
Disciplinary Hearing Commission of the North
Carolina State Bar,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

JUDGMENT
5:14-CV-243-BR

Decision by Court.
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that defendants’ motions to dismiss are
ALLOWED. Defendants’ motions to stay the order for a discovery plan are DENIED as moot.
Plaintiff’s motions are DENIED. Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This case
is closed.

This judgment filed and entered on September 12, 2014, and served on:
David Campbell Sutton (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)
Barry S. McNeill (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)
I. Faison Hicks (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)

September 12, 2014

/s/ Julie A. Richards,
Clerk of Court