SCM, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America et al

Filing 17

ORDER granting 15 Consent Motion to Stay - The parties are directed to submit a status report regarding the arbitration proceedings no later than 90 days from the filing of this order, and every 90 days thereafter until the arbitration proceedings are concluded. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 06/17/2014. (Baker, C.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION ) United States of America for the Use and Benefit ) of SCM, Inc., ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of ) America and Fidelity and Deposit Company of ) Maryland, and Caddell Construction Co., Inc. ) ) Defendants. ) Civil Action No.: 5:14-CV-00258-FL ORDER This matter is before the court on the Defendants’ Motion to Stay pending completion of binding arbitration. The allegations of Plaintiff’s Complaint allege that the subcontract at issue includes a binding arbitration provision and the underlying breach of subcontract claim is subject to, and should be submitted to, binding arbitration. Additionally, Plaintiff consents to Defendants’ Motion to Stay. It appears to the Court that the requirements of the Federal Arbitration Act for a stay of this action pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 3 have been satisfied. Therefore, the Motion to Stay is ALLOWED, and this action shall be stayed pending the completion of binding arbitration between Plaintiff and Defendant Caddell Construction Co., Inc. The parties are directed to submit a status report regarding the arbitration proceedings no later than 90 days from the filing of this order, and every 90 days thereafter until the arbitration proceedings are concluded. 17th SO ORDERED this the ____ day of June, 2014. ______________________________ Louise W. Flanagan United States Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?