Cruthirds v. Lacey et al

Filing 63

JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that pursuant to the courts order dated 5/22/2017, defendants motion to dismiss, (DE #45) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiffs claim for violation of the FMLA is DISMISSED. Plaintiffs claim for breach of contract remains. IT IS FURTHER ORDERERD that the defendants motion to dismiss, (DE # 56), is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of defendants and close this case. Signed by Susan K. Edwards, Deputy for Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 8/30/2017. Copy sent to Shelia Y. Cruthirds, 3509 Kennicot Road, Fayetteville, NC 28311 via US Mail. (Edwards, S.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION SHELIA Y. CRUTHIRDS, Plaintiff, v. RAYMOND P. LACEY, BRANDI SWART, KATHY J. SHEARER, SONDRA McMILLAN, KAREN MILLER, CHILD YOUTH SCHOOL SERVICES/DIRECTORATE FAMILY, MORALE, WELFARE & RECREATION AND JOHN M. McHUGH, Secretary, Department of The Army, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT IN A CVIIL CASE CASE NO. 5:14-CV-260-BR Decision by Court. This action came before this Court for ruling as follows. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that pursuant to the court’s order dated 5/22/2017, defendants’ motion to dismiss, (DE #45) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff’s claim for violation of the FMLA is DISMISSED. Plaintiff’s claim for breach of contract remains. IT IS FURTHER ORDERERD that the defendants’ motion to dismiss, (DE # 56), is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of defendants and close this case. This Judgment Filed and Entered on August 30, 2017, and Copies to: Shelia Y. Cruthirds (via US Mail to 3509 Kennicot Road, Fayetteville, NC 28311) Rudy E. Renfer (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) DATE PETER A. MOORE, JR., CLERK August 30, 2017 _____________________________ (By) Susan K. Edwards, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?